هل مات يسوع مقتولا ؟ قراءة نقدية لمتى 49:27

الدياتسرون لا يصب فى صالح الاضافة وفى وجودها مكانها متفق مع التقليد اليوحناوى انه بعد موت يسوع وليس قبله

ثانيا تحليل كلام القديس سيرفيرس الانطاكى والتعليق على كلام ذهبى الفم

كلام ذلك القديس اورده كاملا فيلند فيلكر فى تعليقه النصى على هذا العدد وساحلل كلام ذلك القديس لانه مهم جدا
اولا فى خطابه لتوماس اسقف جيرمانيكا يقول
But that our Lord Jesus Christ our God was pierced in the side with a lance by that soldier after he gave up the ghost, and blood and water came forth from it in a miraculous manner, the divine John the Evangelist recorded, and no one else wrote about this
معنى ذلك ان الرب يسوع طعن بالحربة فى جنبه بعد ما اسلم الروح وخرج دم وماء من جنبه والوحيد الذى كتب عن هذة الحادثة هو يوحنا الانجيلى ولا غيره

ثانيا بيشهد على خطا من ادخل تلك العبارة الى انجيل متى جاعلا طعن يسوع بالحربة قبل موته وليس بعد تسليم الروح

But certain persons have clearly falsified the Gospel of Matthew and inserted this same passage, when the contrary is the fact, in order to show that it was while he was alive that the soldier pierced his side with the spear, and afterwards he gave up the ghost

الغريبة انه بيتكلم عن نسخة انجيل متى الاصلية التى وجدت مدفونة مع القديس برنابا واكتشتف فى عهد الملك زينو وقال انه لما فتح الانجيل وجده خاليا من تلك الاضافة

This question was examined with great carefulness when my meanness was in the royal city [Constantinople], at the time when the affair of Macedonius was being examined, who became archbishop of that city, and there was produced the Gospel of Matthew, which was written in large letters, and was preserved with great honor in the royal palace, which was said to have been found in the days of Zeno [ca. 474-491 CE] of honorable memory in a city of the island of Cyprus buried with the holy Barnabas, who went about with Paul and spread the divine preaching; and, when the Gospel of Matthew was opened, it was found to be free from the falsification contained in this addition, of the story of the soldier and the spear

يستهشد بيوسابيوس القيصرى على اصالة تلك الاضافة فى نسبتها للقديس يوحنا وليس القديس متى

Accordingly, you should know that Eusebius of Caesarea also who is called ‘Pamphili’, who wrote the canons of the gospel, and imitated those who wrote on this subject before him, and had more complete knowledge of this question than the others, in the 10th canon, in which he recorded the places peculiar to one of the evangelists, inserted this passage also about the soldier and the lance, saying that John alone recorded it

القديس يوحنا ذهبى الفم نفسه يشهد بان الطعن تم بعد موت المسيح

in the commentary on the same Matthew the Evangelist with regard to this same addition which we are now discussing, himself also said things that fit the truth, for he expressed himself thus: <<But another came up and perforated his side with a lance’. And what could be more wicked than these men? And who could be lawless like them? And who could be more savage than these same men, who showed their madness to such an extent, that they attacked a dead body. But do you mark how their madness was brought about for our salvation

وقال ان كل المعلقين لم يدرجوا تلك الاضافات فى تعليقاتهم ولا اوريجانوس الذى وصفه بانه كان يفحص تلك الامور بعناية ولا ديدموس ولا اى شخص كتب عن تلك القضية

But this addition to the narrative of Matthew the Evangelist has never been inserted by any of the earlier commentators who wrote, not by Origen, who examined such questions minutely, though he sinned in matters that are necessary for the truth of the faith of the church, nor by Didymus, nor by any other man who has written on this subject

فنجد ان الاباء انفسهم قد مارسوا النقد النصى وقالوا بان تلك الاضافة شاذة والوحيد الذى سجل لنا حادثة طعن يسوع هو الانجيلى يوحنا البشير

وفى زمرة الاباء التقليد الثابت والراسخ فى كتاباتهم هو ان جسد يسوع المائت هو من طعن بالحربة
فيقول اوريجانوس فى كتابه ضد كلسس

He puts this question in a spirit of mockery; but we shall show from the serious narratives of the Gospels, although Celsus may not like it, that it was no mythic and Homeric ichor which flowed from the body of Jesus, but that, after His death, “one of the soldiers with a spear pierced His side, and there came thereout blood and water. And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true, and he knoweth that he saith the truth

وينقل لنا الاب متى المسكين ايضا مقولة للعلامة اوريجانوس فيقول “

فى كل الاجساد الميتة يتجمد الدم ولا يخرج منها ماء نقى ولكن نجد فى المسيح العجيبة فى جسده وانه حتى بعد الموت كان فى الجسد دم وماء خرجا من جنبه “

وينقل لنا كلام امبروسيوس فيقول “

بعد الموت يتجمد الماء فى اجسادنا ولكن من الجسد الذى لا يفسد مع انه ميت نبعت منه حياة للكل الماء والدم اللذان خرجا منه الماء للاغتسال والدم للفداء “

والقديس يوحنا ذهبى الفم فى تعليقاته على انجيل يوحنا

يقول
when they came, brake the legs of the others, but not those of Christ. Yet these to gratify the Jews pierced His side with a spear, and now insulted the dead body

ويعلق العالم برنارد على اقتباس ذهبى الفم ويقول

انجيل نقوديموس الابوكريفى ” يعود للقرن الرابع ” ويذكر ان طعن يسوع كان بعد موته واعتمد فى مادته على مصادر اقدم من ذلك التاريخ

هذا كان عن التقليد والاباء الشاهد لصحة التقليد اليوحناوى

Bernard, J. H. (1929). A critical and exegetical commentary on the Gospel according to St. John. Paged continuously. (A. H. McNeile, Ed.) (2:644). New York: C. Scribner’ Sons.

فخروج الدم والماء كان بسبب انفجار القلب وتبعها ذلك تجمع السائل فى كلا الغشائين المحيطين بالرئة والقلب

فلو كان يسوع طعن وهو على قيد الحياة وقلبه ينبض

فلماذا يخرج دم وماء؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟

هذا ليس فقط تقرير الدكتور ميثريل بل تاكيد الكثيرين

فعلى سبيل المثال
(Treatise) argued that the flow resulted from a spontaneous rupture of the heart, together with a decomposition of the blood within the heart of Jesus. The common conclusion of these studies is that the separation of blood into a plasma and a transparent, yellowish fluid is not a medical impossibility. In this view, the purpose of this detailed description is to show that the death of Jesus was real

von Wahlde, U. C. (2010). The Gospel and Letters of John, Volume 2: Commentary on the Gospel of John (817). Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company

فانفجار القلب كان السبب الرئيسى للوفاة وبسببها انفصل الدم وهو ما قال عنه القديس يوحنا الشاهد العيان ” ماء “

وهذا نفس ما قاله الدكتور سترود ان هذة الظاهرة نتيجة انفجار القلب

The immediate cause of death was (it is said) a rupture of the heart, which was followed by a large effusion of blood into the pericardium. This blood, it is supposed, rapidly separated into its more solid and liquid parts

The Gospel according to St. John Introduction and notes on the Authorized version. 1908. Greek text and “Revised version” on opposite pages.; Edited by Arthur Westcott. (B. F. Westcott & A. Westcott, Ed.) (279). London: J. Murray.

ونفس ما قاله الدكتور سترود من مرجع اخر

Dr. W. Stroud (Physical Cause of the Death of Christ) argues that this fact proves that the spear pierced the left side of Jesus near the heart and that Jesus had died literally of a broken heart since blood was mixed with water
Robertson, A. (1997). Word Pictures in the New Testament. Vol.V c1932, Vol.VI c1933 by Sunday School Board of the Southern Baptist Convention. (Jn 19:34). Oak Harbor: Logos Research Systems

فالدليل التاريخى للصلب الرومانى وحتى الدليل الطبى يؤكد ان خروج الدم والماء من جنب المخلص يثبت بلا شك ان يسوع بالفعل قد مات وتحلل الدم وارتشحت السوائل فى الغشاءين المحيطين بالقلب والرئة فخرجوا عند الطعن

وهذا ما قاله
رافى زكرياس ونورمان جسلر فى كتاب

ولالهنا كل المجد